Setup Examples

Winner, loser, and scratch. All examples use hard-deck levels (PM/Weekly) and respect the 09:30 – 09:45 ET no-trade zone.

ⓘ

How to use this page

Compare setup quality, rule adherence, and risk handling across three real outcomes. Focus on process quality first, then outcome.

Winner Clean Trend Day Breakout

Break above PM High with confirmation and follow-through. Proper stop and 2R target plan.

What was correct

Valid break/retest confirmation
Volume participation present
Risk and target defined pre-entry

Execution lesson

Process > prediction
Take planned partials
Do not overmanage early

Setup QualityHigh

Rule AdherenceHigh

Outcome+2R Plan

Loser Failed Breakdown in Chop

Break below range failed quickly. Stop was respected, preventing larger drawdown.

Red flags

Weak follow-through quality
Price kept rotating instead of trending
Price could not stay below the level

Execution lesson

Losses are acceptable when planned
Never widen stop after entry
One bad setup does not justify revenge trade

Setup QualityLow-Mid

Rule AdherenceHigh

OutcomePlanned Loss

Scratch Breakeven Protection Trade

Price moved in favor, then stalled. Stop advanced to breakeven and capital was preserved.

What happened

Initial trigger was valid
Momentum faded before target expansion
Structure justified protective adjustment

Execution lesson

Breakeven management reduces bleed
Not every trade needs full target hit
Protecting capital is an active skill

Setup QualityMid

Rule AdherenceHigh

OutcomeScratch

Key Takeaway

3/3Rules followed

1Winner

0Blown stops

All three trades followed the system. One won, one lost, one scratched. That is how edge works over time. Your job is to execute the process — not predict the outcome.

Starter Pack Interactive Breakdown Playbook PDF